European Research Initiative for Critical Migration Studies



ERIMIS promotes independent research and it works as a center of critical studies and collaborative research** with main focus on the policy discourse framing migrants, and migration from the Central and Eastern European Countries to The Netherlands.

Analyzing the discourse of the immigration policies in the Old State Member Countries, in the last decade – as convergent or divergent with the discourse of Europeanization – is a major theme for ERIMIS. Linking the discourse of Europeanization to the discourse of Migration is the departure point in ERIMIS work.

Migrants from the Central and Eastern European Countries are our main, but not exclusive target and immigration policies as framed by the National Governments in the host countries, are our main research focus.

Policy documents, legislation bills, academic reports released after the supposed failure of Multiculturalism in Europe are taken for critical analysis. The findings of what the text analysis reveals, serve as elements for policy inquiryframe reflection – and policy intervention.

Practices and patterns as observed at the society level, life experiences and stories, as described by migrants themselves in the host countries, are taken for further analysis and methodological review.


The field of migration studies has been dominated for many years by a positivist discourse, whilst the value neutrality of the scientist was taken for granted. The assumption that the researcher speaks the truth in the name of the science, is no longer implicitly presumed, while new paradigms in innovative research underline new directions for the practice of social intervention.

We argue that migration field is in need for an innovative approach, based on critical reflection and ethical awareness, that ‘challenges the prevailing, objectivist view of policy analysis ‘[D. Schon and M.Rein ,1994].

Drawing out the guiding values used in any analysis, should be a point of departure in scholars work and an issue for further investigation.

A clarification of the role-status position(s) often conflicting power positions of the researcher(s)- here perceived as actor(s) involved in knowledge production knowledge transmission and knowledge reproduction – would balance the epistemic power and create the premises for making someone trustable for and accountable to those for whom the policy is thought.

With these assumptions in mind, we argue that an authentic Policy – Research Dialog , connecting Migration Studies as Research Domain with Immigration Policies as ‘ Input Domain’ requires the recognition of the following PRINCIPLES, as MUST guiding TOOLS in researchers and practitioners work:

1 – Ethical awareness
2. – Accountability
3. – Inclusiveness

Discursive Frames and Means.Reading the Dominant Discourse Critical and Interpretive